🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.